[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Outline for Author's Guide
- To:
- Subject: Re: Outline for Author's Guide
- From: Tim <>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 17:05:55 -0600 (CST)
-
In-reply-to: <14410.58586.289062.259723@cmpu.net>
- Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-date: 5 Dec 1999 22:33:39 -0000
- Resent-from:
- Resent-message-id: <YkruaB.A.MRD.DhuS4@murphy>
- Resent-sender:
> What kind of tools? I think preparation of the AG should precede
> working on tools. We really don't want people moving to DocBook until
> the AG is complete and they can follow it. I'm also not sure what
> tools need to be created, other than perhaps doing a linuxdoc2docbook
> mass conversion to give pre-existing authors something to start from.
I think a set of minimal tools should be in place with the guide for 1)
using DocBook and 2) converting existing LinuxDoc to DocBook. I do not at
this time want to see any type of migration from LinuxDoc -> DocBook by
any of the authors at this time. I am only making suggestions on what
should accompany the Guide when it's given to the authors/maintainers.
I personally do not see the Author's Guide without them nor do I see the
tools without the Guide.
Yes, I agree that we can write a script to get all the current docs
created, but I also think that allowing the authors to do this themselves
would be a nice beginning point.
This is not a chicken/egg question. I would just like to see they both go
hand-in-hand. Could just be a personal opinion on my part and I'm
perfectly willing to listen and/or change my mind if there is a need.
-tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-docbook-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org