[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: free vs. non-free debate
- To: Alessandro Rubini <>
- Subject: Re: free vs. non-free debate
- From: Guylhem Aznar <>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 00:50:41 +0100
- Cc:
-
In-Reply-To: <19991101094021.59632@morgana.systemy.it>; from rubini@prosa.it on Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:40:21AM +0100
-
References: <19991101094021.59632@morgana.systemy.it>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 2 Nov 1999 00:09:23 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <acSzM.A.dhH.zuiH4@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:40:21AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> Please note that I'm not against helping people in their problems,
> independently of the freeness of the relevant packages. It's the LDP,
> as an organization, that should not promote non-free software by
> endorsing the documenting task.
We will refuse documentation covering non-free software.
Free software need free documentation, we don't mind non-free software.
--
Save Mumia Abu Jamal !! http://ornitho.org/mumia/
Linux Documentation Project: http://www.linuxdoc.org
Clef PGP/PGP key: http://oeil.qc.ca/~guylhem
Chez moi/At home: guylhem \@/ oeil.qc.ca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org