[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative sgmltools?
- To: , ,
- Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
- From: "Greg Ferguson" <>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 17:10:12 -0500
- Cc: Gerard Beekmans <>
- In-Reply-To: Mark Komarinski <markk@cgipc.com> "Re: alternative sgmltools?" (Dec 22, 2:45pm)
-
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912222132090.583-100000@bastion.hugo.vanderkooij.org> <38612A4F.D4DAC5C@cgipc.com>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 22 Dec 1999 22:05:40 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <c3DrBC.A.RWH.0sUY4@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Dec 22, 2:45pm, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
>
> Is there a reason for this? Having one tool that supports both LD
> and DB will be quite helpful.
>
> -Mark
>
> Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
> >
> > However sgmltools (v2) does not work with Linuxdoc but requires
> > DocBook SGML sources.
> >
> > Hugo.
This does not make sense to me, as the tools should be DTD independent.
I've got v2, and it looks as though a linuxdoc DTD and stylesheet(s)
were not included with the package.
These components *should* be all that is necessary to make the tools
work with linuxdoc-DTD-based SGML source file(s).
Ferg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org