[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative sgmltools?
- To:
- Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
- From:
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 15:03:47 +0100 (CET)
-
In-Reply-To: <199912250025.RVH12384@zebra.alphacdc.com>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 25 Dec 1999 14:04:05 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <0ZV7ED.A.E9D.V7MZ4@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Vern Hoxie wrote:
.....
> I had another major problem. That was running out of virtual memory
> when trying to compile ParserState.cxx. The fault is that the "make"
> script runs "python" and then "make". I had six "make"s plus "python"
> using up memory (from a "ps eax" readout). Again, a poorly written
> script.
Discussion of the technical bits is beyond the scope of this mailinglist
and would be better served on the sgml-tools mailinglist.
> The developers apparently run on University or Corporate main frames
> where memory is infinite (or nearly so).
P120 32MB RAM + 128MB swap was sufficient for me.
Hugo.
--
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial)
email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org