[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ODE - requirement for Editors
- To: Guylhem Aznar <>
- Subject: Re: ODE - requirement for Editors
- From: Martin Wheeler <>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 01:01:29 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: ,
-
In-Reply-To: <20000111012106.C1334@guylhem.free.fr>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 12 Jan 2000 01:05:31 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <DlYz9B.A.TbE.aN9e4@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 02:23:53PM +0000, Martin Wheeler wrote:
>> Not only to correct the typos, orthographic errors, dubious grammar and
>> semantic ambiguities any writer eventually becomes blind to, but -- far more
>> essentially -- to ensure that coherent form and structure are maintained and
>> understood by all members of a hugely disparate team, usually working in
>> (almost) total isolation from one another.
>
> LDP 'Peer review' ensures this
Great!
How are the peer reviewers attributed/paired with their respective texts/authors?
Is it a one-to-one ongoing arrangement; or a "take-it-as-it-comes" process?
msw
--
Martin Wheeler - StarTEXT - Glastonbury - BA6 9PH - England
mwheeler@startext.co.uk http://www.startext.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org