[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CD edition
- To:
- Subject: Re: CD edition
- From:
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:30:20 +0200 (CEST)
-
In-Reply-To: <39087FA3.FD08A514@mail.nyx.net>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:31:55 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <t9d1SD.A.1gD.TeIC5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Stein Gjoen wrote:
> jdd wrote:
>
> > Frankly, on a demo cd, I don't see why we should use other than pure html
> > version. A w3m compatible one, as they all must be.
>
> I agree that the HTML should follow the standards but I do not agree
> HTML should be the only format. Many have just one machine and when
> installing Linux they might not be in a position to read the HOWTOs
> or the guides, in which case a nicely printed postcript version would
> be ideal.
PostScript is not common in the world of windows. PDF is therefor beter
for printing purposes.
ASCII is also invaluable if you just got a working single user shell and
more at your disposal while you try to figure out what went wrong.
Hugo.
--
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quoting this tagline is illegal! (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org