[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
conditional expression in LinuxDoc (Re: if SGML is so great...)
- To:
- Subject: conditional expression in LinuxDoc (Re: if SGML is so great...)
- From: Taketoshi Sano <>
- Date: 07 May 2000 16:18:37 +0900
- Cc: "" <>
-
In-Reply-To: <39124447.589DC741@tiac.net>(pac1@tiac.net's message of "Thu, 04 May 2000 23:47:19 -0400")
-
References: <A5F46F4ED18FD211ABEE00105AC6CF077F8065@email.cu-portland.edu> <39124447.589DC741@tiac.net>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 11:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <_xr37C.A.XTC.ShYF5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
- User-Agent: T-gnus/6.13.3 (based on Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.5 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Hi.
at Thu, 04 May 2000 23:47:19 -0400,
pac1@tiac.net writes:
> I'd like to be able to take sets of documentation and extract the following
> kinds of information under program control:
>
> o A list of commands with frequently used options explained
> o A list of commands with frequently used combinations of options and
> explanations of the purpose of the combinations
> o A list of definitions of terms used in explaining a command
> o A list of "frequently used options and option values"
> o A full list of options and parameters with explanations and examples
>
>
> In short, to be able to produce different views of the documentation not just
> in different formats, but with different levels of detail and differing focus
> in the content view.
I don't know what you want, but I think you can get some sort of
"different views with different levels of detail" using the combination
of LinuxDoc DTD and sgml-tools v1.
Please refer "SGML-Tools User's Guide 1.0, 10 Nov 1997" written by
Matt Welsh. Updated by Greg Hankins, rewritten by Eric S. Raymond.
Go to " ・ 3.9 Conditionalization" in "3. Writing Documents With SGML-Tools".
It explains the usage of <#if> </#if>, and "-D" option. Please not the original
sgml-tools 1.0.9 has a bug such that it can not handle multi definition (it can
not understand when more than one "-D" options are specified). This bug has been
found by a user of Debian package for potato, and fixed in the current (1.0.9-12).
Regards.
--
Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org