[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SGML tools aren't so great
- To: "der.hans" <>
- Subject: Re: SGML tools aren't so great
- From: Jorge Godoy <>
- Date: 07 May 2000 23:16:09 -0300
- Cc: LDP <>
- In-Reply-To: "der.hans"'s message of "Sun, 7 May 2000 18:53:54 -0700 (MST)"
-
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005071843370.1295-100000@gw-int.LuftHans.com>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 22:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <45R-m.A.wFE.iWiF5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.4
"der.hans" <ldp-discuss@LuftHans.com> writes:
> > I'll repeat...excellent environment to work in, but not cheap.
>
> If they work, then we need to have that listed on the H-H. Frame is
> available where I was working (Motorola) and I could've gotten at least
> one copy of Frame+SGML "for evaluation purposes" if I'd've wanted to :).
>
> If we can get WP and other word processors to spit out good docbook,
> cool. I won't be using them :), but no reason for others to not do
> so. What satanic incantations they have to make is mostly irrelevant as
> long as they provide proper sgml. It's their souls at stake, not mine :).
I'd like to say that although they produce SGML output, one should be
very careful on using them. Always take a look at it's output and see
if nothing can be improved.
It would be nice if we could have one of these to try with Greg's
scripts...
Regards,
--
Godoy. <godoy@conectiva.com>
Departamento de Publicações
Publishing Department Conectiva S.A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org