[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Authorship
- To: "'David Lawyer'" <>,
- Subject: RE: Authorship
- From: Gregory Leblanc <>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:36:22 -0700
- Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 14:36:21 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <7VfG4.A.-SE.qkTQ5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lawyer []
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 11:33 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc; ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
> Subject: Re: Authorship
>
[snip]
> Actually, the use of minimal tags for DocBook might be a good idea if
> it could be made a "standard" and if it's not hard to implement. But
> this is a long-term project (and rather low-priority for the LDP). So
> I'm retracting it with a but ... My apologies to both Gregory Leblanc
> and Gary Preckshot for having to disagree with me on something which I
> wrote by mistake.
Can you define "minimal tags"? I've got no idea what that means.
> What I propose is to have a "Quick-start with LinuxDoc" section of the
> HOWTO-HOWTO that will present the option of just using LinuxDoc
> starting from either template.sgml (or example.sgml which I think is
> better). It will not explain (or even mention) any concepts of sgml
> such as Jade, DSSSL, DTDs, etc. There should be a pointer to it in
> the introduction of HOWTO-HOWTO so that people who do not want to use
> DocBook can jump directly to it. They will be able to do LinuxDoc
> manually using whatever editor/word-processor they already know how to
> use.
What do you think is better about example.sgml than template.sgml?
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org