[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QC draft
- To: Guylhem Aznar <>
- Subject: Re: QC draft
- From: "Mr. Poet" <>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: LDP discuss <>, , recipient list not shown: ;
-
In-Reply-To: <19990910001209.A20181@victis.oeil.qc.ca>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 10 Sep 1999 05:30:50 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <WaiDx.A.JBC.KeJ23@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
In regards...
As long as QC does not bleed into the license territory.
QC Mark - I don't really agree with this one, we are putting a branding on
a document that is voluntarily published and or reviewed.
Just thoughts
Poet
<COMMANDPROMPT> Development in Real Time
<PROJECT> LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<PROJECT> LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT> LDP - Howto Co-Coordinator </PROJECT>
<AUTHOR>Consultants - VAR - Commercial - Networking - WWW/Intranet</AUTHOR>
</COMMANDPROMPT>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
-
References:
-
QC draft
- From: Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@oeil.qc.ca>