[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
- To: "Mr. Poet" <>
- Subject: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
- From: Donnie Barnes <>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:07:31 -0400
- cc: Guylhem Aznar <>, Vladimir Vuksan <>,
-
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909271105450.10545-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com> from "Mr. Poet" <poet@linuxports.com> on Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:08:02 PDT.
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 27 Sep 1999 18:07:53 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <38C18.A.JvC.5J773@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
> Personally I don't care what license you use, I just think that if you
> drop maintainership of a document that we (THE LDP) have the
> right to change the license. The copyright info stays, but the license
> itself can change.
The problem is that it is impossible to define "drop maintainership" in
a general way.
I still don't see this as much of an issue. Rarely can anyone point me
to an example where this has happened and a document that was *useful*
had to be orphaned. Why impose restrictions for a problem that just
never happens?
--Donnie
--
Donnie Barnes http://www.donniebarnes.com djb@donniebarnes.com "Bah."
Challenge Diversity. Ignore People. Live Life. Use Linux. 879. V.
Bats, when dipped in batter and deep fried, still taste pretty bad.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org