[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: free vs. non-free debate



On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Guylhem Aznar wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 09:40:21AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > Please note that I'm not against helping people in their problems,
> > independently of the freeness of the relevant packages.  It's the LDP,
> > as an organization, that should not promote non-free software by
> > endorsing the documenting task.
> 
> We will refuse documentation covering non-free software.
> 
> Free software need free documentation, we don't mind non-free software.

Just curious.

What happens if someone is offered the ability to get paid for writing
free documentation for non-free software? Will you refuse it? Even if this
means turning down a good document?

Hugo.

-- 
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ  Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl        http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial)
    email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org