[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOCTYPE tags
- To: Gerard Beekmans <>
- Subject: Re: DOCTYPE tags
- From:
- Date: 12 Apr 2000 14:43:59 -0300
- Cc:
- In-Reply-To: Gerard Beekmans's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:12:43 -0400"
-
References: <20000412131243.A7206@chaser.linuxfromscratch.org>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 12 Apr 2000 17:44:20 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <qqQ5eB.A.t8B.zXL94@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4
Gerard Beekmans <gerard@linuxfromscratch.org> writes:
> >From SGML sources I've downloaded from the LDP site I see that DocBook
> 3.0 is used (with acompanying <!DOCTYPE blabla PUBLIC "-//DAVENPORT//DTD
> DocBook V3.0//EN">
>
> I'm writing in docbook 3.1 and thus the doctype line is slightly
> different, though my document doesn't contain anything that only works
> with the 3.1 version (it formats just fine when a 3.0 doctype tag is
> inserted).
>
> Just wanted to let you know about this. Is it a problem is I submit the
> original SGML with the 3.1 doctype tag and whoever will process the
> document will change it, or should I change it prior to submitting?
Please,
Submit 3.1 documents. If you change the declaration line some tags may
have their behaviour changed or may not be valid...
Regards,
--
Godoy. <godoy@conectiva.com.br>
Departamento de Publicações
Publishing Department Conectiva S.A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
-
References:
-
DOCTYPE tags
- From: Gerard Beekmans <gerard@linuxfromscratch.org>