[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Something I would like to see
- To: Tom Fawcett <>
- Subject: Re: Something I would like to see
- From: Joshua Drake <>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 16:01:18 -0700
- CC:
- Organization: LinuxPorts and the LDP
-
References: <390FA61F.BDB1AC9E@linuxports.com> <14607.17025.385743.147418@sucia.home>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 19:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <KYRpzC.A.JNH.QM2D5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
Tom Fawcett wrote:
> Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com> wrote:
> > One of the constant drawbacks for the LDP in getting new authors is the
> > requirement that they submit with SGML.
>
> At the risk of sounding like an elitist snot, maybe this is a good thing.
>
> Speaking as a HOWTO author, there's a fair amount of work in organizing,
> writing, illustrating, indexing and maintaining a document. Learning
> SGML/DocBook is not trivial, but it's not horrible either, and it's only a
> small fraction of the (ongoing) overall author effort. I have to wonder
> about the people for whom SGML is such an impediment to getting involved---
> would these people really make good contributors?
>
Absolutely. You are an accountant who has been use MAS 90 for years.
All of a sudden you get a offer from 2 different companies one uses Timberline,
the other uses MAS 90.
You take the MAS 90 job because of familiarity with the application. Does it make
you a bad accountant because you don't want to learn Timberline? Absolutely not.
>
> On the other hand, maybe this is a good reason to keep a separate,
> lower-quality document category, like what the mini-HOWTOs used to be,
> which can be submitted in any format.
Just because someone doesn't know SGML does not make the document either lower
quality or the author any less qualified to write a HOWTO.
>
>
> -Tom
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org