[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
WPO SGML
- To: Martin WHEELER <>
- Subject: WPO SGML
- From: Poet/Joshua Drake <>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 10:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Gary Preckshot <>, LDP <>,
-
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005281131190.1099-100000@startext.demon.co.uk>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 13:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <riCqXB.A.5IF.QUVM5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
<CITE>You makes your choice and you takes your pick -- either spend weeks
<CITE>learning how to use arcane proprietary WP package gizmos; or learn the ins
<CITE>and outs of using a complex DTD.
Actually WPO 2000 SGML is quite simple. It even does something that a text
editor doesn't. It only allows you to select tags that are "allowed" in a
particular area.
This is very helpful for a new person who doesn't understand Docbook or
Linuxdoc rules.
Joshua Drake
<CITE>
<CITE>In neither option does the computer do the "grunt" work -- as ever, it's
<CITE>human memory that bears the strain. (It's called: "learning a new skill",
<CITE>Gary -- a useful trick to acquire in life.)
<CITE>
<CITE>msw
<CITE>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org