[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DocBook Guidelines
- To:
- Subject: Re: DocBook Guidelines
- From:
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 07:51:47 +0200 (CEST)
-
In-Reply-To: <00060821291000.00753@localhost.localdomain>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 01:52:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <uPbViD.A.NkC.8XIQ5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, David Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2000, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> > Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > >
> > Uhm...H-H says we accept GIF, but acknowledge patent disputes.
> > And .EPS won't show up in web or htmldoc versions:
> >
> > For images use [JPG or GIF] and EPS
> >
> > > 3. No short tags. No exceptions.
> > > 4. No deprecated tags.
> >
> > Sounds fair. How depreciated do we want to go? <graphic> isn't being taken
> > out until 5.0, and 4.0 is barely off and running, but there are better reasons
> > than depreciation to use <mediaobject>.
>
> Wouldn't the project, and DocBook in general, be best served by supporting the
> most current recommended usage of the language? Especially for new submissions?
Yes,
But the commonly advocaded version is 3.1 as 4.0 is not that common yet.
Hugo.
--
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Quoting this tagline is illegal! (http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org