[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Mark Komarinski <>
- Subject: Re: Tags
- From: Poet/Joshua Drake <>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Joe Cooper <>, Gregory Leblanc <>, "" <>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-Message-ID: <ldy2MB.A.4qE.OukR5@murphy>
This is what I use as well. It is very good.
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Mark Komarinski wrote:
<CITE>Joe Cooper wrote:
<CITE>> Gregory Leblanc wrote:
<CITE>> Ok, what are the deprecated and to-be deprecated tags?
<CITE>> <graphic> is the only one I know off hand. Godoy and Mark know these
<CITE>> better than I, for sure.
<CITE>I'm getting my list from DocBook: TDG. I'm using this as the bible of
<CITE>depreciated tags (if it's listed there as depreciated, I won't use it).
<CITE>The latest H-H says this as well.
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
- From: Mark Komarinski <email@example.com>