[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Blank template
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > From: Mark Komarinski 
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 10:42 AM
> > To: Gregory Leblanc
> > Cc: 'Joe Cooper'; Ldp Discuss List (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: Blank template
> > Thanks Joe, I was going to let this go another couple days
> > and *then* say something (almost like a vacation!).
> > Here's my changes. Mostly adding in revision information.
> So, am I going a good direction with this? Too many comments? Too few?
I'm assuming this is aimed at the extreme novice Docbook author; if so, you're
right to err on the side of overkill.
Umm, (no license holy wars, please), here's my suggested revision for the
Copyright section. Does the full text of the license need to appear as an
appendix in the document, as well? (The H-H includes the statement 'If you
choose to use the boilerplate copyright, simply copy it into your source code
under a section called "Copyright and Licenses" or similar.' but I'm still not
quite sure what that means.)
< <para>This blank HOWTO template is copyrighted (c) 2000 by YOUR NAME</para>
< <para>PUT THE HOWTO BLURB HERE</para>
> <!-- you can choose an alternate license; refer to the HOWTO-HOWTO -->
> <para>Copyright (c) by YOUR NAME. This document may be distributed only subject
> to the terms and conditions set forth in the
> <ulink url="http://www.linuxdoc.org/COPYRIGHT.html">LDP License</ulink>.</para>
< <!-- end of the document -->
\ No newline at end of file
> <!-- end of the document -->
Friend of the abnormal.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org