[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SGML in other applications
- To: LDP <>
- Subject: Re: SGML in other applications
- From: Bruce Richardson <>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:16:56 +0100
-
In-Reply-To: <3949423B.545175C@inreach.com>; from garrell@inreach.com on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 01:53:15PM -0700
- Mail-Followup-To: LDP <ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org>
-
References: <3949423B.545175C@inreach.com>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 18:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <n6L2EB.A.NfD.jiVS5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 01:53:15PM -0700, Gary Preckshot wrote:
> There's a vague worship of SGML coupled with a confusion or
> lack of requirements for using it, or rather DocBook.
Tolerance level reached and passed. When I read your messages I spend
far too much time gritting my teeth and very little time thinking "Oh,
that's right". You simply don't seem to be able to make a point without
telling the recipient how stupid or wrong they are.
> If that's being an ass, I like being an ass.
Not on my time, thankyou.
--
Bruce
Bitterly it mathinketh me, that I spent mine wholle lyf in the lists
against the ignorant.
-- Roger Bacon, "Doctor Mirabilis"
PGP signature