[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'ReillyOpen Source Convention]]
- To: Karl Eichwalder <>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'ReillyOpen Source Convention]]
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:03:30 +0100 (BST)
- cc: Camille Bégnis <>, docbook-apps <>, LDP <>, docbook-tools list <>
-
In-Reply-To: <shk8eh8mhw.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <g-Lh8D.A.NjD.K00d5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
> > i really cannot see why you want to stick with SGML and DSSSL.
>
> Both are standards defined by ISO. A big plus. I don't mind XML, after
> all it's SGML.
XSL is written in XML :-}
but seriously, who follows ISO standards in this area?
> > why not put the effort into XSL FO?
>
> It's joung, isn't it?
but growing. unlike DSSSL
> And XSL code doesn't look appealing -- I like
> Lisp languages much more than baroque inventitions like XSL. But "de
> gustibus".
i suspect you are in a minority :-}
sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org