[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
- To: Guylhem Aznar <>
- Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
- From: Poet/Joshua Drake <>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Jason Williams <>, Richard Stallman <>, , ,
-
In-Reply-To: <20000728220648.A2832@guylhem.eyep.net>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <N4cV-C.A.W2E.nokg5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
>If you guys think it's ok, that would be the best idea :
> - non free : any license permitting that we redistribute freely the
> document (ex opl a+b)
> - ldp : gfdl or opl -a -b only
I really like this idea :) It is almost like the difference between
downloading RedHat and purchasing it :)
I this alot.
Joshua Drake
>
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org