[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Voila! A compromise!


Is there anyone who has a problem with this?

Joshua Drake

On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Richard Stallman wrote:

>    If you guys think it's ok, that would be the best idea :
>     - non free : any license permitting that we redistribute freely the
>       document (ex opl a+b)
>     - ldp : gfdl or opl -a -b only
>I think that segregating the existing non-free documents would be a
>very good idea.  You could continue to distribute them, but those
>of us for whom they are unacceptable would be able to shun them.
>Meanwhile, it would give new contributors a very clear message
>to make their work free.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

<COMPANY>CommandPrompt    - http://www.commandprompt.com      </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.   - http://www.opendocs.org        </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts       - http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP            - http://www.linuxdoc.org        </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org