[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Voila! A compromise!



>I don't like the idea of two separate lists.  It makes it harder to
>find docs.  In my case, my HOWTOs would be considered non-free since
>they require that anyone making a modification and then distributing
>it must send a copy to my email address.  There are various degrees of
>being non-free and just splitting the docs into 2 categories doesn't
>reveal the whole story.  One important category is what all our docs
>meet now: they must be freely redistributable in any media.  But many
>docs in this category are not "free" since they restrict (or prohibit)
>modification.

I agree with this which is why I just suggested some classification within
the listing of the HOWTO. For example in the HOWTO-INDEX it would simply
state:

NFS HOWTO - "Beer-free"
Net-HOWTO - "GNU-free"

Or something like this. That way the docs are still easy to find but the
reader has been notified that the document has certain restrictions on it.

>I believe that we need to have a file which shows the type of license
>for each doc.  I once started on this project and hope to someday
>finish it.  There's a lot of work to do since it includes contacting
>authors that have used ambiguous licenses, etc.  If GNU wants a list
>of our "GNU-free" docs then we should supply it (after we determine
>which ones are "GNU-free" so they can link to these docs (mine
>excluded unless I change my license).

That is a hell of a project. Good luck.

Joshua Drake





>
>In another post I'll discuss the issues of allowing authors to restrict
>modification and prohibit commercial printing.
>
>                    David Lawyer
>
>
>--  
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt    - http://www.commandprompt.com      </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.   - http://www.opendocs.org        </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts       - http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP            - http://www.linuxdoc.org        </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 
--


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org