[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QC volunteers? (Was: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd))
- To:
- Subject: Re: QC volunteers? (Was: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd))
- From: Terry Dawson <>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:26:32 +1000
-
In-Reply-To: <19990927213432.A3665@victis.oeil.qc.ca>; from Guylhem Aznar on Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:34:32PM +0200
-
References: <19990927010258.A4503@victis.oeil.qc.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909270816590.27635-100000@spork.cs.unm.edu> <19990927213432.A3665@victis.oeil.qc.ca>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 28 Sep 1999 00:26:45 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <re0ZAB.A.Yv.FtA83@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:34:32PM +0200, Guylhem Aznar wrote:
> With this example, I think we really need a special clause to the
> manifesto to leave some rights to the LDP if an author want to take his
> document off :-(
Then you'd better start the process of making the LDP a legal entity so
it can legitimately own something.
If you were to add such a clause then you would immediately invalidate
large portions of your existing document base from being included in the
LDP.
Terry
--
terry@albert.animats.net, terry@linux.org.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org