[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QC volunteers? (Was: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd))
- To:
- Subject: Re: QC volunteers? (Was: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd))
- From:
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:19:30 +1000 (EST)
-
In-Reply-To: <19990928111258.A1019@victis.oeil.qc.ca>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 29 Sep 1999 01:19:46 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <q1jznC.A.5gB.xkW83@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On 28 Sep, Guylhem Aznar wrote:
>> If you were to add such a clause then you would immediately invalidate
>> large portions of your existing document base from being included in the
>> LDP.
>
> It will only make possible updates to any unmaintained documents.
Any unmaintained documents *that already have licenses that will allow
you to do this*. Which is next to none. Get ready to rewrite most of
the LDP documentation. You cannot impose additional license
restrictions on a document unless its' license allows you to.
Terry
--
terry@albert.animats.net, terry@linux.org.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org