[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative sgmltools?
- To:
- Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
- From: Mark Komarinski <>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:45:19 -0500
- CC: Gerard Beekmans <>,
-
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912222132090.583-100000@bastion.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
- Reply-To:
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 22 Dec 1999 19:45:28 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <d7Xj2B.A.mq.YpSY4@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
- Sender:
Is there a reason for this? Having one tool that supports both LD and DB
will be quite helpful.
-Mark
Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
>
> However sgmltools (v2) does not work with Linuxdoc but requires DocBook
> SGML sources.
>
> Hugo.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Carlo Gavazzi IPC | Mark F. Komarinski, RHCE - Compat. Engineer|
176 Second Ave | markk@cgipc.com - www.cgipc.com |
Waltham, MA 02451 USA | Ph: 781-290-4800 x138 Fx: 781-290-4810 |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org