[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SGML tools aren't so great
- To: LDP <>
- Subject: SGML tools aren't so great
- From: Tom Fawcett <>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
-
In-Reply-To: <391070BC.ECBE2128@inreach.com>
-
References: <391070BC.ECBE2128@inreach.com>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 00:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <EJeqMD.A.byB.UlPE5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
Gary Preckshot <garrell@inreach.com> wrote:
> Kevin Turner is the only one who correctly perceived that I
> was objecting to having to learn SGML just to write a doc.
Please explain what "just to write a doc" means here, to you.
I am serious.
I have no real interest in the ongoing SGML-vs-not-SGML debate.
But I'm genuinely confused and mystified by the (occasionally expressed)
implication that writing and maintaining documentation really isn't
much effort. This seems to be an assumption underlying a lot of
this debate, and I just don't get it.
Thanks,
-Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org