[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rep:Re: Permission to submit HOWTO
- To: LDP <>
- Subject: Re: Rep:Re: Permission to submit HOWTO
- From: Gary Preckshot <>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:21:32 -0700
- Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 02:31:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-Message-ID: <fYdv9.A.9NE.k5bT5@murphy>
> (How's the view up there Gary?)
Lonely, as always. But I'm used to it.
> Trouble is that the information you're putting in the resulting
> documents is also needed in other input formats. Not just additional
> output formats.
That was the problem that Goldfarb eventually solved,
although he wasn't so ambitious at first.
> I hope you can start discussing ideas about the structure
> of information pertaining to Linux instead of getting into extended
> discussion of why any one familiar or favorite tool can be used to do
> "everything", without ever defining what the "everything" is.
Good point! I made the mistake of slurring their favorite
editor, and a lot of them can't get past that.
> Many are busy developing and deploying as Docbook documents. While they
> do so, they are devloping a resource of information. This resource is
> recorded as a docbook file. We need to examine new uses for the
> information, asking how best to represent this information so it can be
> effecively used. Docbook may not be the whole answer, or if Docbook can
> be refined and extended without making it so complicated that docbook
> itself becomes unusable, maybe it is. The answer may be DocBook and
> something else yet to be invented. Either way we should not care too
> much about any one tool.
Actually DocBook has features yet unplumbed. A lot of them.
If you read DB:TDG, you can see Walsh's intentions. DocBook
is actually a far more general tool than any usage LDP is
making of it. It's really designed for large accumulations
of papers or other written documents. I suspect that
organizations like the APS or IEEE, with large databases of
technical journals, are going to go to a DTD like DocBook.
> In any case, Docbook and SGML are where linux documentation is today.
> That's ok. The work being done using these tools is valuable. I use
> the results regularly and I thank you for it. Now let's move on and
> define the future.
Right! If LDP uses it right, conversion to a later format
will be easy. A matter of putting a fast computer with big
disks to work.
It's really a database design problem. Just like any
database, if the data are there, you can find them or
transfer them to another form.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org