Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)

• To:
• Subject: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
• From: Stein Gjoen <>
• Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:17:47 +0200
• Cc:
• References: <200007182112.1c98@lh00.opsion.fr>
• Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 03:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
• Resent-From:
• Resent-Message-ID: <Ma9u4D.A.w0C.FZVd5@murphy>
• Resent-Sender:

guylhemlistes@ifrance.com wrote:
[big snip]

> My idea : let's go for /opt/doc and put this tree, if
> FSSTND comes with an intelligent place in the future,
> it will just be a matter of replacing /opt/doc by
> that in the future.

I don't expect FSSTND to be updated; rather it is superceeded by the
FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) which is intended to be a standard for
more operating systems than Linux alone.

More information is available at
        http://www.pathname.com/fhs/

I believe the path for LDP documents would be somewhere below
        /usr/share/doc

Regards,
   Stein Gjoen


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
    • From: Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@metalab.unc.edu>

• References:
  • Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
    • From: <guylhemlistes@ifrance.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
• Next by Date: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]
• Prev by thread: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
• Next by thread: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread