[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Processing of XML does not require XSL (Was: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention
- To: Gary Lawrence Murphy <>
- Subject: Processing of XML does not require XSL (Was: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 10:28:36 +0200
- cc: docbook-apps <>, LDP <>, docbook-tools list <>
In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Gary Lawrence Murphy <email@example.com>'s message of Wed, 19 Jul 2000 22:19:45 EDT)
- Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 04:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-Message-ID: <acBHJ.A.WRH.Ghrd5@murphy>
On Wednesday 19 July 2000, at 22 h 19, the keyboard of Gary Lawrence Murphy
> Since the DocBook XML files are (IIRC) XSL files and there are "no
> seriously reliable XSL FO" tools, then isn't the answer to "Can I
> print DocBook XML?" also "no"?
It is often said, specially in marketing publications, that you need XSL to do
anything with XML.
THIS IS PURE BULLSHIT!
XML is a subset of SGML. You can use any SGML tool, like jade, which I use to
process my DocBook/XML files.
Also, you can use custom programs written with the SAX or the DOM APIs, for
which implementations exist for many programming languages.
> Maybe I am just getting lost in acronyms again. The real question I
> want to answer is must simpler: Given a DocBook XML source file, what
> are the shell commands to generate a printable output at least as good
> as DocBook SGML through jadetex?
Exactly the same :-)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com