[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
- To: Richard Stallman <>
- Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
- From: Poet/Joshua Drake <>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: , , , ,
-
In-Reply-To: <200007222223.QAA08908@wijiji.santafe.edu>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:31:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <yiv0lB.A.UGD.3cme5@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
> IMHO) it allows complete distribution electronically, and you can print it
> all you want as long as it is not for profit.
>
>That limitation is exactly the problem--if something is limited to
>"not for profit" then it is non-free.
I do not see this as a problem. I completely understand your argument. I
just do not agree with it.
J
>
>
>--
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org