[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal


Yes it would, but I leave that to the authors. It is the authors ultimate
responsibility to decide the extent of their agreement with "free".


On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Richard Stallman wrote:

>The GFDL will be used in the future for all GNU manuals, and for some
>commercial free manuals.  Using the GFDL for LDP manuals will make it
>possible to move text between these manuals, much as using the GPL for
>software makes it possible to move code between programs.
>So I suggest that people choose the GFDL rather than the GPL for
>their manuals.
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

<COMPANY>CommandPrompt    - http://www.commandprompt.com      </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.   - http://www.opendocs.org        </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts       - http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP            - http://www.linuxdoc.org        </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org