[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

Le lun, 24 jui 2000, Guylhem Aznar a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 07:26:47PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > I will not do so. I think the Open Publication is a good license. I think
> > that option B (but not A) is an excellent option for corporations and
> > individuals alike.
> Yet there is a restriction on commercial reprint.
> Harmless for the LDP; but not free. We shouldn't restrain people from
> making money with free software !

example of such problems : I write a tutorial for a Linux formation. I
want to make my learners read some HOWTO's. I give them the HOWTO in the
original translated form (translated by the official team). This tutorial
is NOT free

Is this allowed by the licence? May I read any HOWTO licence to know what
to do.

I think R.S. is right. linuxdoc must be free

<http://www.dodin.net> <>
QUI EST CET HOMME ? Aidez-moi à le retrouver
WHO'S THAT GUY ? Help me found it

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org