[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: updates


I don't use the ldp.dsl. I use straight what comes with Redhat 6.2 plus
the 1.54 of walsh.

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Greg Ferguson wrote:

>On Aug 10,  1:26pm, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>> Subject: RE: updates
>> Hmm, how did you process that Poet?  It doesn't look like any
>> of the stuff from ldp.dsl is in there.  My first guess would
>> be that we fouled something up with the 2-level TOC, but I
>> haven't checked yet.
>>        Greg
>It's worked just fine in the past. I'm going to get a copy of
>whatever Poet used to process his instance and take a look.
>    Ferg
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-docbook-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

<COMPANY>CommandPrompt    - http://www.commandprompt.com      </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.   - http://www.opendocs.org        </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts       - http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP            - http://www.linuxdoc.org        </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-docbook-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org