[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what is wrong with LDP
- To: Jeffrey Greer <>
- Subject: Re: what is wrong with LDP
- From: Guylhem Aznar <>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 15:11:09 +0200
- Cc: LDP discuss <>
- In-Reply-To: <37DB26F5.88D75610@showmethenet.com>; from Jeffrey Greer on Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 11:07:17PM -0500
- References: <37DB26F5.88D75610@showmethenet.com>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 12 Sep 1999 18:24:13 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <pnbPbC.A.UQC.N_-23@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 11:07:17PM -0500, Jeffrey Greer wrote:
> I entered this into LDP's search "hardware compatibility" and nothing
> relevent came up. Either LDP's search engine is a joke or there
> really isn't a hardware compatibility list in LDP. Either case is
> pretty sad. Linux developers need to work on documentation. There
> should be a single list for pc hardware compatibility
The search engine is under work.
Only the 1st and 2nd level pages have been indexed. The HOWTOs will be
indexed soon.
--
Guylhem Aznar, Linux Documentation Project leader: http://www.linuxdoc.org
Clef PGP/PGP key: http://oeil.qc.ca/~guylhem
Chez moi/At home: guylhem \@/ oeil.qc.ca
Anywhere/Partout: guylhem-pager \@/ oeil.qc.ca
PGP signature