[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: LDP License (full text)
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: LDP License (full text)
- From: "Richard Ames" <>
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 09:39:59 +1000
- Importance: Normal
-
In-Reply-To: <199910010600.AA01196@lafn.org>
- Reply-To: <>
- Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
- Resent-Date: 1 Oct 1999 23:40:10 -0000
- Resent-From:
- Resent-Message-ID: <zSku7.A.52D.ZZU93@murphy>
- Resent-Sender:
<cut>
> LINUX DOCUMENTATION PROJECT LICENSE (LDPL)
> v2.0, 12 January 1998
>
<cut>
This looks generally sensible. My view is - The author always owns the
copyright. The (free) license he gives allows others to reproduce the work
or extend it...
A related and interesting (recent) court result is at
http://www.nwu.org/tvt/9909vic.htm
Regards,
Richard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org